Tuesday, August 06, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson
A newly-published study has revealed that Merck & Co., the
corporate mastermind behind the infamous Gardasil vaccine for human
papillomavirus (HPV), conveniently forgot to research the effects of
this deadly vaccine on women's reproductive systems. And at least one
young woman, in this case from Australia, bore the brunt of this
inexcusable failure after discovering that her own ovaries had been
completely destroyed as a result of getting the vaccine.
Published in the peer-reviewed British Medical Journal
(BMJ), the harrowing recount of this young 16-year-old girl's
experience should give pause to all parents currently being pressured by
their doctors into having their young daughters jabbed with Gardasil.
Robbed of her natural ability to experience full womanhood, this young
woman experienced early menopause, in which her ovaries completely shut
down before they were even able to fully develop.
Entitled Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination,
this latest case study provides solid evidence that Gardasil is, at the
very least, a serious threat to normal ovarian function. Not only was
the damaged girl examined and verified to have had healthy ovaries prior
to the shots, but there were no other identified factors besides
Gardasil that could have possibly been involved in her sudden ill-fate.
Worse is the fact that information later obtained from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for the case -- TGA is Australia's equivalent of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S. -- revealed that Merck had never even conducted safety testing on Gardasil
in relation to its effects on women's ovaries. According to the report,
Merck had only tested Gardasil's effects on male testes.
"Although
the TGA's Australian Public Assessment Report for Human Papillomavirus
Quadrivalent Vaccine, February 2011, does report on the histology of
vaccinated rat testes and epididymides, no histological report has been
available for vaccinated rat ovaries,"
explains the report. "[A] histological report of the ovaries of
vaccinated rats remained unavailable beyond a numbering of the corpora
lutea present at postweaning euthanasia following the first litter."
In other words, Merck
either intentionally or accidentally -- either option is completely
unacceptable, by the way -- failed to check whether or not Gardasil has
the potential to damage young women's reproductive systems, even though
young women have always been the primary target market for the vaccine.
Only recently have young boys been pulled into the Gardasil fray,
despite the fact that the long-term side effects of the vaccine in males
is still largely unknown.
Gardasil loaded with additives known to damage female reproduction
As reported by investigative journalist Heidi Stevenson, there are at least two additive ingredients in Gardasil that may be responsible for damaging women's ovaries. These ingredients are polysorbate 80, an emulsifying preservative, and L-histidine, a natural amino acid. Both of these ingredients are, of course, used in processed foods, which millions of people consume every day. But injecting them into the body has a much different biological effect than simply consuming them.As it turns out, polysorbate 80, which also goes by the names Tween 80, Alkest, and Canarcel, has been shown in studies to damage female reproduction. Not only does this chemical additive greatly accelerate sexual maturation in women, but it also tends to reduce the weight and function of both the ovaries and the uterus. Similarly, L-histidine, when injected into muscle tissue, can cause the body to develop an autoimmune response to the natural substance, which can lead to many of the serious side effects being observed in many young girls who have been jabbed with Gardasil.
Be sure to read the following two reports by Heidi Stevenson to learn more about how Gardasil appears to damage female reproduction:
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com
http://gaia-health.com
Sources for this article include:
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com
http://gaia-health.com
http://pop.org
0 comments:
Post a Comment